Letter from Linus Pauling to Henry Allen Moe. December 28, 1951. Page 1  Larger Images / More Information. 2 pp.  View Transcript

<   December  1951     S M T W T F S             1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Activity Listings

• Bill from the Apothecary Shop of the Thatcher Medical Building to AHP for $1.61. Handwritten note: “Pd.” [Filed under LP Biographical: Business and Financial: (Assorted Bills, Receipts and Invoices, 1951-1962.), Box #4.060, Folder #60.1]
• Letter from B. D. Van Evera to LP, RE: Concerns Stephen Brunauer’s resignation from the Navy under pressure. States that they have composed a petition to the Secretary of the Navy requesting a hearing to determine if Stephen Brunauer is a good security risk. Asks LP to sign the attached petition. Asks LP to keep the list of scientists that received the petition confidential. [Letter from LP to Van Evera, January 3, 1952] [Filed under LP Correspondence: (Brunauer, Stephen), #32.6]
• Letter from George A. Boyd, Medical Division, Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies, to LP, RE: Thanks him for his letter and says that he will try to mention LP’s work at a bone conference in January. [Letter from LP to Boyd, December 18, 1951] [Filed under LP Correspondence: (B: Correspondence, 1951), #37.18]
• Letter from S. H. Human to LP, RE: Asks if anyone has ever tried to purify the blood from a dead person for use in transfusions. [Letter from LP to Human, January 10, 1952] [Filed under LP Correspondence: (H: Correspondence, 1951), #166.2]
• Letter from V. Bush, Carnegie Institution of Washington, to LP, RE: Informs LP that he has written to the Industrial Employment Review Board and hopes that his statement has some value. [Filed under LP Biographical: Political Issues: (Industrial Employment Review Board/Industrial Personnel Security Board, 1951-1954.), Box #2.010, Folder #10.1]
• Letter from W. Albert Noyes, Jr., Editor, Journal of the American Chemical Society, to LP, RE: Discusses papers that he encloses for LP to look over but states that he does not expect LP to provide detailed comments. [Letter from LP to Noyes, January 3, 1951] [Filed under LP Correspondence: (Journal of the American Chemical Society), #191.1]
• Letter from W. B. White to LP, RE: Asks for his opinion of Koch’s cancer research work. Inquires if the hypothesis could be a chemical fact. Handwritten note in the upper left-hand corner: “Dr. Rich: what would you say?” [Letter from LP to White, January 8, 1952] [Filed under LP Correspondence: (W: Correspondence, 1951), #443.19]