Telegram from Linus Pauling to Alden Emery. Page 1. November 8, 1950
Telegram from Linus Pauling to Alden Emery. November 8, 1950. Page 1  Larger Images / More Information. 1 p.

Travel: Chicago, IL

Activity Listings

  • Check from AHP to Marshall Field and Company for $24.92. [Filed under LP Biographical: (Business and Financial: Bank Statements and Canceled Checks, December 1948-November 1950; 1960-1962), Box #4.019, Folder #19.2]
  • Check from AHP to Marshall Field for $12.69. [Filed under LP Biographical: (Business and Financial: Bank Statements and Canceled Checks, December 1948-November 1950; 1960-1962), Box #4.019, Folder #19.2]
  • Check from LP to Antique Art Galleries for $40.80. [Filed under LP Biographical: (Business and Financial: Bank Statements and Canceled Checks, December 1948-November 1950; 1960-1962), Box #4.019, Folder #19.2]
  • Itinerary: Institute of Metals, University of Chicago (?) [Filed under LP Travel: Box #1.001, Folder 1.8]
  • Letter from Albert Fields to LP RE: Sends LP two papers - “Rapid Test for Sickle Cells” and “Pathology Conference of the Medical Service, Feb. 24, 1947.” [Filed under LP Correspondence: (F: Correspondence, 1950), #128.15]
  • Letter from E. H. Volwiler to Alden H. Emery, American Chemical Society, RE: Writes that he approves of the deadline change. [Letter from Warner to Emery, November 3, 1950, Letter from LP to Emery, November 13, 1950] [Filed under LP Science: (American Chemical Society: Correspondence, 1950-1964), Box #14.006, Folder #6.3]
  • Letter from E. H. Volwiler to Alden H. Emery, American Chemical Society, RE: Writes that he is still in favor of the Committee rendering its report to the Board and Dr. Thomas forwarding his letter to Robert L. Clark. Also writes that he is in favor of publishing the report in the C. & E. N. [Filed under LP Science: (American Chemical Society: Correspondence, 1950-1964), Box #14.006, Folder #6.3]
  • Letter from E.H. Volwiler to Mr. Alden H. Emery, American Chemical Society, cc: Exec. Com. Board of Director, RE: States that he is not in favor of publishing Ralph Spitzer’s letter because he says it involves an ideological discussion which could continue a long time without getting into the facts of the case. [Letter from Emery to the Executive Committee, Board of Directors, October 27, 1950] [Filed under LP Personal Safe, Drawer #1, Folder #1.032]
  • Letter from Kenneth J. Palmer, Western Regional Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, to LP RE: States that he was pleased that LP thinks it will be possible to have a crystallographer work at his laboratory to obtain x-ray photographs of lysozyme crystals. Discusses this matter in more detail. [Letter from LP to Palmer, October 20, 1950] [Filed under LP Correspondence: (Palmer, Kenneth J.), #304.3]
  • Letter from Wm. D. Stewart, Chairman, Hamilton Section, Chemical Institute of Canada, to LP RE: Thanks LP for visiting Hamilton and giving a splendid lecture at the university. Writes that Mrs. Stewart thinks AHP is “one of the finest women she has ever met.” States that if they ever visit Pasadena, it will be so that she can visit AHP. [Filed under LP Speeches: 1950s.24]
  • Letter from the Secretary to Dr. Gregg, the Rockefeller Foundation, to LP, RE: Acknowledges his letter of October 20th about Dr. Ralph Spitzer. Says that Dr. Gregg has asked for her to tell LP that they have not had a reply from the State Department. [Filed under LP Personal Safe, Drawer #1, Folder #1.032]
  • Telegram from LP to Alden H. Emery, American Chemical Society. [Filed under LP Science: (American Chemical Society: Correspondence, 1950-1964), Box #14.006, Folder #6.3]

    Alden Emery

    Nov. 8 1950
    Sent from Drake Hotel Chi.[cago]

    I approve plan generally. However I strongly urge change of regulations pages 10 and 11 which severely handicap institutions such as CIT. We admit 180 freshmen selected by examination from about 1000 applicants. I believe practically all students would be in top half of class in average school. Very small number of failures or D grades. Could not required standing be left to discretion of regional boards?

    LP