Letter from Linus Pauling to E.J. Crane. Page 1. October 5, 1948
Letter from Linus Pauling to E.J. Crane. October 5, 1948. Page 1  Larger Images / More Information. 1 p.  View Transcript

Activity Listings

  • Letter from Beatrice Wulf, Secretary to LP, to Dr. E.C. Kleiderer, Lilly Research Laboratories, RE: Sends a copy of “Mr. Polton Explains” which LP thought Kleiderer might enjoy. [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #111.4, file:(Eli Lilly and Company, 1946-1951, 1953-1956, 1964-1968, 1970-1972)]
  • Letter from C. H. Fisher, Philadelphia Section, to LP. RE: Informs him that they will make arrangements for LP's accommodations. Requests a photograph, an abstract of the talk, and a biographical sketch. [Filed under LP Science: American Chemical Society: Correspondence, 1943-1948: Box #14.004 Folder #4.2]
  • Letter from Executive Secretary to E. C. Gilbert, Oregon State College. RE: Informs him that LP will definitely stop for luncheon on Saturday November 6th. [Filed under LP Science: American Chemical Society: Correspondence, 1948-1949: Box #14.004 Folder #4.1]
  • Letter from LP to Dr. Andrew H. Dowdy, Chair, Committee on Biophysics, L.A. Country Medical Association, RE: Writes that he is leaving on a trip for the ACS and will not be able to work on the requested article for at least a month. [Letters from Dowdy to LP October 5, 1948, October 21, 1948] [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #230.14, file:(L: Correspondence, 1948)]
  • Letter from LP to Dr. B. S. Madhava Rao, Secretary, Indian Academy of Science, RE: Thanks Rao for the invitation to submit a paper for publication in a Symposium. Apologizes for not being able to accept the invitation. [Letter from Dr. B. S. Madhava Rao to LP September 28, 1948] [Filed under LP Correspondence: #326.5]
  • Letter from LP to Dr. F. J. W. Roughton, Dept. of Colloid Science, RE: Assures Roughton that he will get the manuscript to the publisher by November 15th, and states he is looking forward to seeing Roughton again. Mentions the interesting results of an experimental involving human hemoglobin and sickle cell disease done by Dr. Harvet Itano. [Letter from F. J. W. Roughton to LP October 2, 1948, from LP to Dr. F. J. W. Roughton November 13, 1948] [Filed under LP Correspondence: #336.8]
  • Letter from LP to Dr. H. F. Wakefield. RE: Grateful to him for arranging the meeting change. Verifies the subject of the talk. [Filed under LP Science: American Chemical Society: Correspondence, 1948-1949: Box #14.004 Folder #4.1]
  • Letter from LP to Dr. J. T. Thurston, American Cyanamid Committee. RE: Looks forward to being in Stamford on March 15th. Suggests topics for the address. [Filed under LP Science: American Chemical Society: Correspondence, 1943-1948: Box #14.004 Folder #4.2]
  • Letter from LP to Niels Bjerrum RE: Invites him to give a talk at the Research Conference of the Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering sometime after November 12. [Letter from Bjerrum to LP October 14, 1948] [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #37.15, file:(B: Correspondence 1948)]
  • Letter from LP to Reva Mucha, Secretary, Committee to Welcome the Dean of Canterbury RE: Accepts membership to the committee and gives permission for his name to be used in connection with the committee. [Letter from Mucha to LP October 21, 1948] [Filed under LP Correspondence Box: #74.16, file:(C: Correspondence, 1948)]
  • Letter from M'Kean Maffitt to Gentlemen of Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists. Encloses a paper he prepared and presented before the Wilmington Engineer's Club and Wilmington Lions Club, where he also gave out copies of Norman Cousins' article. Writes that if can be of assistance in the future to please call on him. [Letter from Ray to Maffitt, October 15, 1948]. LP Peace: Box 3.005, Folder 5.4
  • Letter from W. H. Freeman, W. H. Freeman and Company to Dr. Harper W. Frantz, Pasadena City College cc: LP RE: Says his letter of October 2 is helpful and he will check further the call for an edition of A Laboratory Study of Chemical Principles without worksheets and qualitative. Thinks he should show LP the fourth paragraph of his letter as he believes the answer to their problem of not putting in too much descriptive material while still enabling the students to understand the theoretical principles lies in there. Adds that Dr. Malm should not be asked to participate in a collaboration. [Filed under LP Correspondence: 439.6]