25 July 1968
Mr. William Hart
Yliopistonk. 4A28
Jyvaskyla, Finland
Dear Mr. Hart:
The question that you ask in your letter, about how many children have been killed by atomic warfare or atomic testing from 1945 through 1967, is a hard one to answer. A difficulty is that the calculation can be made only on a statistical basis. A child who dies of leukemia, for example, may have leukemia caused by radioactive fallout, or may have leukemia caused by some other source of high-energy radiation or some other cause.
In my Nobel peace prize lecture, which I gave in Oslo on 11 December 1963, I stated that I estimated that 100,000 viable children would be born with gross physical or mental defects caused by fission products and 1,500,000 more, if the human race survives, with gross defects caused by carbon 14 from the bomb tests. In addition, I said, about ten times as many embryonic, neonatal, and childhood deaths are expected—about one million caused by the fission products and fifteen million by carbon 14. I also estimated that about two million human beings alive at that time would die 10 or 15 years earlier than if the nuclear tests had not been made, as a result of leukemia, bone cancer, and other diseases caused by the radioactive material from the bomb tests.
The total number of people affected in these ways, roughly twenty million, refers to a large number of generations. Moreover, I included embryonic deaths in the total.
I also mentioned that about five percent of the fission-product effect and 0.3 percent of the carbon-14 effect might appear in the first generation; that is, about ten thousand viable children with gross physical or mental defects and one hundred thousand embryonic, neonatal, and childhood deaths. In addition there would be some children who would die in the first generation because of leukemia and other diseases.
I now conclude that, as a rough estimate, I would give the number 100,000 as the number of children killed by atomic testing from 1945 through 1967. This is a very rough estimate: the true number might be only half as great, or twice as great.
Sincerely yours,
Linus Pauling
LP:jj