Linus Pauling and the Race for DNA: A Documentary History All Documents and Media  
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day


Letter from Gerald Oster to Linus Pauling. January 26, 1953.
Oster writes to share his and D. P. Riley's equatorial intensity calculations for the cable model protein structure recently proposed by Pauling. Oster and Riley's calculations seem to indicate flaws in Pauling's structure. Oster also notes his plan to further study predictions made by Pauling about the structure of alpha-keratin and suggests a possible molecular structure for nucleoproteins.




January 26, 1953

Prof. Linus Pauling

Gates and Crellin Laboratories of Chemistry

California Institute of Technology

Pasadena 4, California

Dear Professor Pauling,

I was very interested in your ingeneous cable model of the structure of proteins which appear in Nature. Would you kindly send me two reprints of this paper and reprints of further work on this subject?

Since there will no doubt be many attempts to verify your model experimentally, I think it is very important that the anticipated inter- ferences be calculated exactly. Dr. D. P. Riley and myself have calcu- lated the equatorial intensities for an aggregate of seven rods (your AB6 model) in Acta Crystallographica 5 272 (1952) which we have applied to our scattering data for desoxyribose nucleic acid (Biochim. Biophys. Acta 7 526 (1951)). Judging from your earlier paper with Corey, I imagine you calculated the form factor for equatorial spacing ( 1 + 6J0(X)) by treating the A6 ring of rods as a shell about the central B rod. However, our detailed analysis of the problem gives for the normalized intensity

1/49 [7 + 24 J0(x) + 6J0 (2x) + 12 J0( √3x) (1)

This quantity in turn should be multiplied by the normalized intensity for a solid rod (a fair approximation to your helix) namely by

[2J1 (x) / kR]2 (2)

If the rods are in contact x = (4Л/λ)ρ sinθ .

If the rods are not in contact (lateral swelling as seems to be the case for collagen, for example) then x in expression (1) above becomes


ρ sinθ where γ is the "degree of swelling" while x remains unchanged in expression (2) if, as is usually the case, the interatomic distances in the rod remain unchanged on swelling.

Prof. Pauling January 26, 1953

For your AB6 model where the rods are in contact (Y= i.o) we obtain maxima at x=(0), 3.8, and 6.0 (for infinite two-dimensional array there should be a sharp maximum at x=7.2). Taking your rod as 10 A0 then there should be maxima in intensity along the equator at sinθ / γ = (0), 0.030, 0.048 reciprocal Angstroms corresponding to Bragg spacings (first order) of 16.5 and 10.4 Angstroms. For comparison, an infinite lattice of hexagonally close-packed rods of diameter 10 Å gives a spacing at 8.8 Angstroms.

You suggest in your paper that there may be overlapping in the X-ray diffraction diagrams of α-keratin at low angles. I am planning to do small angle experiments with keratin to look for fine structure along the equator. I think such work is important to understand the gross structure of proteins of the kind you discuss in your paper. It would be nice if your model of the seven strand cable is correct. Riley and I postulated a nearly similar arrangement for deoxyribose nucleic acid. It is conceivable that the protein cables could fit alongside of or be intermingled with the nucleic acid cables to form nucleoproteins - but I guess I'm off in the realm of fantasy.

Sincerely and with best personal [sic] regards to you and Professor Corey

Gerald Oster


Return to Document Page

Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day