Linus Pauling and the Structure of Proteins: A Documentary History All Documents and Media  
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day

All Documents and Media

Letter from Linus Pauling to Robert W. Newburgh. May 19, 1986.
Pauling writes to recount aspects of the history of his involvement in antibody/antigen research as well as his more contemporary thinking on the subject.

Transcript

HUMANISM AND PEACE

Dr. Robert w. Newburgh Head, Biological Sciences Division Office of the Chief of Naval Research Arlington, VA 22217-5000

Dear Dr. Newburgh:

I was pleased that you should ask for a reprint of my paper in Nature, 1953. I enclose the reprint, and also another reprint in which acknowledgment is made to the Office of Naval Research.

I have always felt grateful to the Office of Naval Research for its continued support of my early work in the field of molecular biology. Also, I was glad to serve as a consultant to ONR.

During the period of about ten years, 1940 to 1950, I carried out, with my colleagues and students, an extensive series of investigations to determine the nature of the forces involved in the interactions between molecules of antibodies and the corresponding antigens or haptenic groups. The results of the very extensive studies were published in a series of papers, mainly in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. I was led to the conclusion that there is a detailed complement-ariness in structure between the combining region of the antibody and the corresponding (complementary) regions of the antigens or haptenic groups. We were able to get quite detailed evidence about the contribution of various factors - the shape and size of the atoms, how they are arranged relative to one another, the van der Waals dispersion energy of attraction, the attraction between opposite positive and negative charges, the formation of hydrogen bonds, and others.

It was my feeling then that the question about biological specificity - its nature and molecular basis - had been pretty well answered by these studies.

The studies, however, were carried out with antisera that were rather heterogenous.

For some time I have been thinking that it might well be possible to obtain more information about the nature of these interactions, by the use of homogenous antibody preparations obtained by cloning. Many of our earlier studies should, I think, be repeated with monoclonal antibody preparations. Although I am moderately well satisfied with the understanding of the nature of receptor-ligand (antibody-hapten) interactions that we developed around 40 years ago, I am sure that additional insights could be obtained by a rather extensive series of studies with monoclonal antibodies. I am sure that this additional information would have value for all systems involving specific intermolecular interaction.

I note that one of your fields of interest in molecular biology is receptor-ligand interaction. If you think that ONR might be interested in receiving an application from my associates and me, please send me the forms.

One of my former students and collaborators in the field of immunochemistry, George Feigen, professor of physiology in Stanford University, died a year or two ago. There is no one in our Institute working with monoclonal antibodies at the present time, but we have space to set up a laboratory, if the funds were available. If we were to embark on this program we would need to have complete support for it, extending over a period of a few years.

I have been thinking of writing a book on the nature of the forces involved in these interactions, based largely on our early work. If we were to get a grant or contract to investigate the matter further, I should plan to delay writing the book until some of the work with monoclonal antibodies had been done.

Sincerely,

LP

LP: dm

Return to Document Page

Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day