Linus Pauling and the Structure of Proteins: A Documentary History All Documents and Media  
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day

All Documents and Media

Memorandum from Walter Schroeder to Linus Pauling. September 18, 1952.
Schroeder writes to provide Pauling with a summary of published papers discussing the possibility of fractionating wool.

Transcript

HUMANISM AND PEACE

To: Prof. Pauling

From: Walt

Subject: Possibility of Fractionating Wool

In the discussion the other day you referred to papers by Goddard. The exact references are D. R. Goddard & L. Michaelis, J. Biol. Chem. 106, 605 (1934) and 112, 361 (1935). I would like to summarize the salient points of these papers.

In the first paper, the authors describe the reduction of the –S–S– bonds in wool by such agents as thioglycolic acid, potassium cyanide, or sodium sulfide. The solubility and enzyme digestibility of the sulfhydryl protein reproduced differ greatly from these properties of the original wool. The sulfhydryl protein is easily acidized by air or mild oxidizing agents to a product which, in contrast to wool, is amorphous, soluble in alkali, and digestible by pepsin or trypsin.

In the second paper, the preparation of derivatives of reduced keratin (kerateine) is described. These derivatives were formed by reacting the –S–H with iodoacetic acid. Only carboxymethylkerateine (the derivative from iodoacetic acid) is sufficiently soluble to permit an attempt of fractionation which in this case was achieved by the use of ammonium sulfate. From 50g. of starting material, 30 g. of fraction A (the less soluble) and 2g. of fraction B (the more soluble) were obtained. The S, N, and amino N content of fraction A is much like that of the original protein but fraction B has higher S and lower n and amino N content. They differ in solubility and isoelectric behavior.

It is certainly interesting to note that the quantified fraction A and B which were isolated and in the proportions which one might expect if that is one C-chain per 2 AB6-calles and also that fraction A to is less soluble than fraction B.

I have checked Chemical Abstracts for the last fifteen years under the headings of “Hair,” “Keratin,” and “Wool” but I have not been able to find any papers of interest.

The most feasible method of fractionating wool seems, therefore, to be the fractionation of the carboxymethyl derivative of the reduced protein.

Walt.

Return to Document Page

Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day