Linus Pauling and the Structure of Proteins: A Documentary History All Documents and Media  
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day

All Documents and Media

Letter from Alexander Rich to Linus Pauling. November 10, 1955.
Rich writes to rebut Pauling's critique of the collagen structure that Rich and Francis Crick formulated for publication in Nature.

Transcript

Dear Dr. Pauling,

Thank you for the dimensions of the proline ring and your comments about the collagen model which Francis and I have formulated.

We are indeed aware of the disadvantages which you describe, especially those dealing with the deficit of Hydrogen bonds. However, if the sequence –gly–pro–hypro occurs systematically in collagen, one must of necessity lose hydrogen bonds, neglecting for the moment those introduced through side chains.

I am enclosing a copy of the manuscript which we sent off to Nature, and which should appear soon.

We have looked at the infra-red absorption predicted by this model (I should say these models) and we believe the amide II dichroism would be II and weak. In this determination we have filled about 1/3rd of the pro sites with proline and 1/3rd the hypro sites with hydroxyproline. We have also used the transition moments obtained by Sandeman (Proc. Roy. Soc. A232, IC5, Oct. 1955), which were similar to those obtained by Arthur Elliott in studying Acetamidizole. However, I quite agree that one should not put too much weight on the finer features of the infra-red spectrum.

With best regards, yours sincerely,

Alex

Return to Document Page

Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day