Linus Pauling and the Structure of Proteins: A Documentary History All Documents and Media  
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day

All Documents and Media

Memorandum from John E. Leonard to Linus Pauling. January 7, 1952.
Leonard writes to present an idea for a method that he has devised for interpreting an x-ray crystallographic photograph of muscle.

Transcript

In the interpretation of the Lotman-Picken photograph of muscle it would be helpful to be able to estimate with confidence the relative quantities of the materials responsible for the α-keratin portion and the crystalline portion of the observed x-ray scattering.

As a possible practical approach to this problem I have prepared a photograph of a horsehair to which are attached three very fine, needle-like crystals of urea. The urea crystals were so long that they extended beyond the x-ray beam in both directions along the fiber. Since the density of urea (1.335) is close to that of the density expected for horsehair (about 1.3), the relative amounts of urea and horsehair in the beam could be taken as proportional to their respective cross sections. These respective cross sections, as calculated from measurements of the hair and the crystals with a micrometer eyepiece, were found to be in the following ratio:

cross section of crystals = 0.0029 mm.2 = 0.05

cross section of hair 0.06 mm.2

[Data Equation]

Maximum error of measurement, 10%

The attached photograph was made by rotating the combined sample in a beam of copper radiation; sample to film distance, approximately 3.25 cm. A flat-film Unicam camera was used.

It is interesting, although perhaps not significant, to note that Bloor ("Biochemistry of the Fatty Acids", p.200) lists the following data on the composition of dry muscle tissue.

[Data Table]

John E.

Return to Document Page

Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day