Linus Pauling was a very stubborn man. All of the attacks on his character made in
1950 -- the press accusations, the Caltech investigation, the hate mail, and lost
contracts -- only seemed to increase his political activism. Through the 1950s, he
figured, he spent fully half his time on political work. It was not because he liked
it that much. He later said that he would have greatly preferred thinking about scientific
problems. But he stayed involved in peace work for several reasons. In part it was
because he refused to be pushed around. In part it was because, as he put it, "I felt
that it was my duty as a citizen of the United States of America and as a scientist
to take part in politics." In part it was to keep the respect of his wife. Finally,
at a very deep level, he simply felt that it was his birthright.
America, in his view, was built on the concept of free speech, so it was his duty
to speak freely about what he thought was true. In his view, American politics could
be considered a matter of statistics. "The principle upon which a true democratic
system operates is that no single man is wise enough to make the correct decisions
about the very complex problems that arise, and that the correct decisions are to
be made by the process of averaging the opinions of all the citizens in the democracy,"
he told an investigatory committee. "These opinions will correspond to a probability
distribution curve extending from far on the left to far on the right. If, now, we
say that all of the opinions that extend too far to the right. . . are abnormal, and
are to be excluded in taking the average, then the average that we obtain will be
the wrong one. An understanding of the laws of probability would accordingly make
it evident to the citizen that the operation of the democratic system requires that
everyone have the right to express his opinion about political questions, no matter
what that opinion might be." The free expression of political opinions, no matter
what they were, was more than a right or a responsibility. It was a statistical necessity.
|