It's in the Blood! A Documentary History of Linus Pauling, Hemoglobin and Sickle Cell Anemia All Documents and Media  
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day

All Documents and Media

Letter from Linus Pauling to C. Lockard Conley. August 1, 1978.
Pauling writes to discuss the roots of his interest in the study of hemoglobin. In so doing, Pauling mentions work carried out in collaboration with Charles Coryell on the sigmoid oxygen equilibrium curve of hemoglobin, the impact made upon him by other colleagues including Karl Landsteiner and Dan Campbell, and the transition of his interests in the study of sickle cell anemia.

Transcript

1 August 1978

Professor C. Lockard Conley

Hematology Division

Department of Medicine

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

601 N. Broadway

Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Dear Professor Conley:

In answer to your letter of 25 Jul 1978, about hemoglobin, let me say first that my interest in hemoglobin was not specifically directed by someone at the Rockefeller Institute.

I enclose a list of my papers from 1922 to 1967, About 25 papers on hemoglobin are listed there. I also enclose a recent paper by me on hemoglobin.

I had been working on various problems of the structure of molecules and crystals for about a decade when, about 1934, I began to wonder about the sigmoid oxygen equilibrium curve of hemoglobin. My first paper on hemoglobin was a discussion of this curve and nature of the heme-heme interactions in the hemoglobin molecule. My first paper on hemoglobin was a discussion of this curve and the nature of the heme-heme interactions in the hemoglobin molecule. While thinking about this problem I realized that information about the nature of the bonds between oxygen and hemoglobin could be obtained measuring the magnetic properties of hemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin. Charles Coryell, who had just received his Ph.D. degree, became my assistant at that time. We discovered the striking difference magnetic properties of hemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin, and were able to draw significant conclusions about the nature of the bonds and the structure of the hemoglobin molecule in the neighborhood of the iron atoms from these observations. During the next few years we and others in our laboratory made many measurement of the magnetic properties of hemoglobin and related compounds. We were able to determine equilibrium constants and rates of reactions by using this technique.

I lectured on this subject in the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. Karl Landsteiner showed much interest in my lecture, and later he asked me many questions about my interpretation of observations made by him and others in the field of immunochemistry. I then wrote my 1940 paper on the structure of antibodies and nature of serological reactions, and began an extensive series of experimental studies in immunochemistry, my principal collaborators being Dan H. Campbell, whom I brought to Pasadena from Chicago, and David Pressman.

In 1945 I was serving on a committee on medical research in the United States. At a dinner in New York, we discussed various matters, and William B. Castle mentioned some work that he was doing on sickle-cell anemia. I immediately pointed out that some observations made on patients with sickle-cell anemia or on blood from these patients could be accounted for if the assumption were made that the patients were manufacturing an abnormal hemoglobin, with molecules containing two mutually complementary groups, permitting them to aggregate into long helical rods and ultimately to form a long crystal, which would twist the red cell out of shape. Attachment of oxygen or carbon monoxide to the hemoglobin would prevent the molecules from achieving the close proximity that would result in this aggregation, and hence would stop the sickling. I asked Castle if he knew of anyone's having suggested this idea, and when he gave me a negative reply I said that I though that I would work on the problem. A few months later Ed Doisy wrote to me about a student he had had, who was interning in Detroit and had a postdoctoral fellowship to permit him to work for a Ph.D. in chemistry. He suggested that he come to Pasadena to come to work with me, which he did. This man was Harvey Itano. I wrote to him in Detroit, after it had been decided that he would come to Pasadena, suggesting that he work on the problem of the nature of the hemoglobin in patients with sickle-cell anemia. This effort in course of time led to the publication of our paper "Sickle-Cell Anemia, A Molecular Disease," and to the discovery of several other hemoglobins in our laboratory, hemoglobins in our laboratory, hemoglobins C,D, and E.

In related work in our laboratory we were able to show that the human hemoglobin molecule contains polypeptide chains of two types, which we called the A chain and the B chain. These designations were later changed to alpha chain and beta chain.

So far as I am aware, my idea in 1945 that human hemoglobinopathies exist was the first time that this idea had been expressed. Our 1949 paper was the first paper showing that there is in fact a human hemoglobinopathy, and it was followed by work leading to a great development of this field. My earlier work on leading to a great development of this field. My earlier work on a magnetic properties ofhemoglobin was responsible in large part for development of the now-accepted ideas about the binding of oxygen and carbon monoxide.

In your letter you ask if I would be willing to write a brief account of my work on hemoglobin. the sketch in the above paragraphs is too superficial to be of value. If you could tell me how much of my work you would like to have summarized and how long the summary should be, I would be willing to write it.

Sincerely,

LP:dm

Return to Document Page

Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day